DSA Faculty
API
← к списку преподавателей

Барабашев Алексей Георгиевич

Факультет социальных наук

Профиль на hse.ru ↗ тел.: +7 (495) 771-32-44 | 11121
Публикаций
95
Языков
1
Наград
24
Конференций
0
Профиль Публикации (95) Курсы (9)

Профессиональные интересы

государственная служба в Российской Федерациимуниципальная службаадминистративная реформафилософия управления

Должности

  • Профессор — Факультет социальных наук, Департамент политики и управления
  • Ведущий научный сотрудник — Центр исследований гражданского общества и некоммерческого сектора

Био

  • · Начал работать в НИУ ВШЭ в 2004 году.
  • · Научно-педагогический стаж: 50 лет.

Образование

  • 1993 · Ученое звание: Профессор
  • 1990 · Доктор философских наук: Московский государственный педагогический университет, специальность 09.00.08 «Философия науки и техники», тема диссертации: Развитие способов систематизации математического знания
  • 1990 · Кандидат наук: специальность 09.00.08 «Философия науки и техники», тема диссертации: Диалектика развития геометрического знания
  • 1978 · Аспирантура: Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова, кафедра философии и методологии науки, специальность «философия науки»
  • 1975 · Специалитет: Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова, факультет: механико-математический, специальность «Математика», квалификация «Математик»

Опыт работы

  • · 2004: С 15 декабря года я перешел на работу в ГУ-ВШЭ, профессором кафедры государственной службы факультета государственного и муниципального управления ГУ-ВШЭ. Являлся заведующим кафедрой государственной службы, до 17 декабря
  • · 2011: года исполнял обязанности декана факультета. Начиная с 17 декабря
  • · 2011: года был назначен научным руководителем указанного факультета. После вхождения факультета в департамент политики и управления ФСН, возглавил академический совет аспирантской школы по ГМУ. Ординарый профессор

Награды и поощрения

  • · Благодарность Центра исследований гражданского общества и некоммерческого сектора НИУ ВШЭ (март 2026)
  • · Почетная грамота НИУ ВШЭ (май 2023)
  • · Медаль "Признание - 15 лет успешной работы" НИУ ВШЭ (декабрь 2022)
  • · Благодарность факультета социальных наук НИУ ВШЭ (ноябрь 2022)
  • · Благодарственное письмо проректора НИУ ВШЭ (ноябрь 2021)
  • · Почетная грамота Губернатора Ярославской области (июль 2021)
  • · Благодарность старшего директора по основным образовательным программам НИУ ВШЭ (май 2020)
  • · Почетная грамота Высшей школы экономики (апрель 2019)
  • · Медаль "Признание - 10 лет успешной работы" НИУ ВШЭ (октябрь 2018)
  • · Благодарность правительства Ярославской области (июль 2018)
  • · Благодарность Министерства труда и социальной защиты Российской Федерации (декабрь 2017)
  • · Благодарность Факультета социальных наук НИУ ВШЭ (сентябрь 2017)
  • · Благодарность Высшей школы экономики (апрель 2012)
  • · Почетный знак II степени Высшей школы экономики (декабрь 2011)
  • · Благодарность Высшей школы экономики (декабрь 2011)
  • · Благодарность Высшей школы экономики (июль 2011)
  • · Нагрудный знак "Почетный работник высшего профессионального образования РФ" (октябрь 2010)
  • · Почетная грамота Высшей школы экономики (ноябрь 2007)
  • · Премия имени Ленинского комсомола в области науки и техники (апрель 1987)
  • · Персональная надбавка ректора (2017–2018)
  • · Надбавка за академическую работу (2016–2017, 2015–2016, 2014–2015, 2012–2013, 2011–2012, 2010–2011, 2009–2010, 2008–2009, 2007–2008, 2006–2007)
  • · Надбавка за публикацию в журнале из Списка А (и приравненном к нему научном издании) (2023–2024)
  • · Надбавка за публикацию в международном рецензируемом научном издании (2022–2023, 2021–2022)
  • · Лучший преподаватель — 2018, 2016, 2013–2014

Гранты и проекты

  • — · на соискание учёной степени кандидата наук

Идентификаторы исследователя

Публикации (95)

The role of intergovernmental relations in response to a wicked problem: an analysis of the COVID-19 crisis in the BRICS countries

2021 · ARTICLE · en

Globally, policy environments have become increasingly more complex with the growth in the number of wicked problems, such as that posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. In their response to these problems, public administrations have, from necessity, become heavily reliant on their intergovernmental relations systems, as the challenges posed generally require multilevel responses. This paper analyzes the role of intergovernmental relations in shaping the responses of the BRICS countries when confronted with COVID-19. We develop an analytical framework to understand the dynamics of intergovernmental relations in these countries. Based on this we assess the capacity of the state and political systems to manage intergovernmental relations and ensure effective responses to the COVID-19 crisis. This framework is based on an analysis of three dimensions of the policy domain: the political and state system, formal and informal institutions, and the political alignment between them. Whilst state and political systems were found to be instrumental in formulating an immediate response to the crisis, informal institutions and political processes also played a prominent role in determining the extent to which strategies were implemented, particularly in countries that are more decentralized. Countries lacking the robust formal institutions needed to facilitate intergovernmental relations and to ensure swift policy responses, tend to deliver ineffective and inefficient results when confronted with wicked problems.

DOI ↗ PDF ↗

俄罗斯政府对新冠肺炎危机的应对：基于经验主义的证据

2021 · ARTICLE · zh

The main outlines of the actions of Russian government in response to COVID-19 crisis are presented according to the directions: the measures to support economy, social protection system, health and education, taking into account Russian situation with National budget are described; the self-isolation and other restrictions measures both from Federal and from Regional powers to prevent the dissemination of the COVID-19 are discussed in the context of intergovernmental relations that is based on Russian traditions and heterogeneity of the country; the extra-ordinary measures to optimize the functions of Federal Governmental bodies and to reduce the functions that are not effective and costly are highlighted. The current processes of rapid changes in the system of Russian governance are embedded in the theoretic approach of Government competitiveness evaluation (Indicative approach).

PDF ↗

Public Personnel Job Satisfaction and Retention: The Effects of Perceived Image and Prestige of Government Jobs

2021 · ARTICLE · en

Given the turbulent development of Russian public service after the socialism-capitalism transition in the 1990s and continuous government bashing, one might expect finding low morale and negative perceptions of government jobs among public administrators. This study examines the factors that influence job satisfaction (JS) and government job decisions (GJD) of government employees and tests their tenure intentions. The study uses the internal vs. external prestige and the positive vs. negative government image concepts to measure the attitudes. The results of ordinal and binomial logistic regressions suggest that government employees’ perceptions of government image, and prestige influence JS and GJD.

DOI ↗ PDF ↗

The Innovative HR Practices of Regional Administrations: Is it a New Round of Civil Service Reform in Russia ?

2020 · ARTICLE · en

Th e paper examines the innovative HR practices of regional administrations in Russia and the inter-regional cooperation between HR departments of regional governmental bodies; in practice the dissemination is complicated by their relations with the federal bodies (national level) responsible for civil-service regulation. Th e authors use the case of Russia to describe the positive experience of blended inter-regional (horizontal) and federal-local (vertical) cooperation between HR departments of the civil service (federal, regional, municipal) that started as a “best practices” initiative, guided by the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of Russia (MLSP of Russia) in 2015. Several cases of such cooperation are described as examples of positive infl uence on the civil service with pushing changes, and as a tool to foster civil-service reform.

DOI ↗ PDF ↗

Handbook of research methods in public administration, management and policy

2020 · BOOK · en

The goal of the handbook is to add significant knowledge and experience to research methods in public administration, management and policy by exploring, in both a detailed and progressive manner, a variety of research methods that can take our field and discipline into the next generation of evolution. Its aim to provide readers (students, academics, field experts, policy designers, policy makers, etc) with the most advanced toolbox for understanding the science of public administration, management, and policy for the third decade of the twenty-first century. It is focused mostly on innovative research architectures, useful research techniques and best practices for the study of modern bureaucracy and the behavior of its agents and stakeholders. Providing specific examples of how these methods are used will enable a down-to-earth understanding of a variety of intellectual paths and sophisticated techniques.

DOI ↗

Constructive ending: how to finalize the conclusion and discussion of a research project and a journal article

2020 · CHAPTER · en

The chapter discussed the problem how to arrange final segment of the research article, i.e. the conclusion and discussion sections. The chapter proffer suggestions on how to shape these sections better, in a more constructive way, i.e., how to present these sections of the article, and of the research project accordingly.

DOI ↗ PDF ↗

Serving the Country or Serving Thyself: The Quest for Prosocial Motives of Russian MPA Students

2019 · ARTICLE · en

U.S. and European scholars have established the association between work in government and public service motivation (PSM). Yet, few studies measure PSM among master of public administration (MPA) students and link it to their intention to work in government. For the first time in Russia, the study tests the association between culturally determined measures of prosocial motives of Russian MPA students and their intention to work for government upon graduation. Three theoretical frameworks help structuring this research: public administration, political trust, and volunteering. The data in this study confirm that Russian MPA students with prosocial motives tend to choose work in government. We explain this phenomenon by deriving the prosocial motive theoretical perspective from the larger concept of PSM and from the theory of political trust. In addition, the study finds that formal and informal volunteering is not related to choosing work in government. The implications of these findings are discussed.

DOI ↗ PDF ↗

Local Strategic Planning: The Case of Russia

2019 · CHAPTER · en

The chapter is ment to highlight the peculiarities of strategic planning in Russia. The history of Soviet and Russian periods of strategic planning is described. Present situation, including groving number of normative acts and practices of strategic planning, especialyy on local (municipal level) shows significance of strategic planning in contemporary Russia. Second half of the chapter is dedicated to the empirical study of strategic planning in some municipal cities.

DOI ↗ PDF ↗

Why Reforms of Public Service of Russia Are Cyclic: An Institutional Explanation from a Liberal Perspective

2019 · CHAPTER · en

From 1992 until the present, Russia has seen two cycles of public service reform. These cycles clearly demonstrate the shortcomings of Russian community of experts in the area public administration. Both cycles began with government statements, responding to a “public request” for the creation of a professional and effective public service. A phase of limited reform followed in both cases, where low-quality, even flawed, administrative procedures were developed. At this stage, the expert community expanded in number, but—paradoxically—its role weakened. Final “bureaucratization of reform” (i.e. realization of the final stages of reform in every cycle by the bureaucracy itself) resulted in the curtailing of experts’ participation. Thus, reform became an instrument to increase the weight of influence at the very the top levels of the bureaucracy and to strengthen the power of the political and administrative elite. In this way, both cycles came to an end more or less in failure, although not a total debacle. The chapter claims that the weakness of Russia’s expert community underlines this cyclical reform cycle. The community of experts in the area of public service reform, as will be shown, is not able to act jointly to support the reform mission. Effective communication among experts working in governmental bodies and outside government (i.e. expert organizations), we argue, is not properly organized. The Russian expert community in the area of public service reform, in other words, does not act like a “guild of professionals”, guided by the liberal principles of open and transparent administration, and effective and citizen-oriented public service. The success in Russian public service reform (including exit from continuous reform cycles) is possible, as we will argue, only in the presence of certain conditions, which rest on an understanding of liberalism as a social phenomenon. We call this “guild liberalism”, or the existence of groups with professional competencies and abilities to change the Russian system of governance in a liberal direction by applying their expertise and by direct participation in reform decision-making. First, the expert community—as a part of civil society—must become rather creative, mature and solid if it is to protect the reform process and keep it on track to achieving its goals. Secondly, top bureaucratic managers must not be the leaders and main stakeholders of the public service reform process. To conclude, we will argue that liberalism in Russia, as social phenomena at the level of professional expert groups, is not completely dead and has the chance to be restored.

DOI ↗ PDF ↗

О совершенствовании индикативных оценок качества государственного управления

2019 · ARTICLE · ru

Рассматривается проблема повышения уровня объективности индикативных оценок качества государственного управления. Устанавливаются причины, затрудняющие разработку и применение индикативных оценок, препятствующие формированию единого теоретического подхода к оценке качества государственного управления на основе анализа данных. Описываются направления критики оценок качества государственного управления на основе анализа данных, показываются недостатки этой критики.

PDF ↗

Курсы (9)