Гурков Игорь Борисович
Высшая школа бизнеса
Профессиональные интересы
Должности
- Профессор — Высшая школа бизнеса, Департамент стратегического и международного менеджмента
Био
- · Начал работать в НИУ ВШЭ в 1994 году.
- · Научно-педагогический стаж: 37 лет.
Образование
- 1998 · Ученое звание: Профессор
- 1998 · Доктор экономических наук: Институт социально-экономических проблем народонаселения РАН, специальность 05.13.10 «Управление в социальных и экономических системах»
- 1990 · Кандидат экономических наук: МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, специальность 08.00.03 «История народного хозяйства»
- 1990 · Аспирантура: Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова, факультет: экономический, специальность «08.00.03 - экономическая история»
- 1987 · Специалитет: Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова, специальность «Политическая экономия», квалификация «Экономист. Преподаватель политической экономии»
Опыт работы
- · 2020: Июль н/вр -- профессор-исследователь Департамента стратегического и международного менеджмента ВШБ НИУ ВШЭ
- · 2012: Май 2002-май зав.кафедры общего и стратегического менеджмента Академии народного хозяйства при Правительстве РФ (нане Россииская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы (РАНХиГС) при Президенте РФ (по совместительству)
- · 2020 г: Май 1994-март профессор, Высшая Школа Экономики
- · 1993: Август январь
- · 1997 г: научный сотрудник, Фонд экономических иследваний при Университете Эразма Роттердамского, Роттердам, Нидерланды (по совместительству)
- · 1993 г.: Сентябрь-декабрь преподватель, Институт стран Азии и Африки МГУ им. М.В.Ломоносова (ИСАА) (по совместительству)
- · 1993: Февраль 1992-август пост-док, Факультет промышленного производства и управления, Технион, Хайфа
- · 1991 г.: Март 1990-июнь преподаватель, Физико-технический институт (ФИЗТЕХ)(по совместительству)
- · 1990 г.: Март 1990- Ноябрь Научный сотрудник, Сектор управленческих нововведений и хозяйственных экспериментов, Институт экономики АН СССР
Награды и поощрения
- · Благодарственное письмо ректора НИУ ВШЭ (август 2025)
- · Диплом "Основатель Вышки" (ноябрь 2022)
- · Почетное звание "Почетный работник науки и высоких технологий Российской Федерации" (ноябрь 2022)
- · Медаль "Признание - 20 лет успешной работы" НИУ ВШЭ (январь 2018)
- · Почетная грамота Высшей школы экономики (декабрь 2016)
- · Почетный знак II степени Высшей школы экономики (сентябрь 2013)
- · Почетная грамота Министерства образования и науки Российской Федерации (ноябрь 2012)
- · Юбилейный знак "85 лет Плана ГОЭЛРО" (декабрь 2005)
- · Почетная грамота Министерства экономического развития и торговли Российской Федерации (ноябрь 2002)
- · Надбавка за академические успехи и вклад в научную репутацию ГУ-ВШЭ (2009–2011, 2007–2009, 2006–2007, 2005–2006)
- · Надбавка за публикацию в журнале из Списка А (и приравненном к нему научном издании) (2024–2025)
- · Надбавка за публикацию в международном рецензируемом научном издании (2022–2023, 2021–2022, 2018–2019, 2017–2018)
- · Надбавка за регулярные публикации в международных рецензируемых научных изданиях (2025–2030, 2023–2028)
- · Надбавка за статью в зарубежном рецензируемом журнале (2015–2017, 2013–2015, 2011–2013)
- · Лучший преподаватель — 2017
- · Лауреат премии "Золотая Вышка" 2006 в номинации Достижения в преподавательской деятельности
Гранты и проекты
- — · на соискание учёной степени кандидата наук
Идентификаторы исследователя
- ORCID:
0000-0001-8116-0425 - ResearcherID:
H-1501-2015 - SPIN РИНЦ:
5666-9007 - Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.ru/citations?user=lb894rwAAAAJ&hl=ru&oi=ao
- Scopus AuthorID:
6603320551
Публикации (227)
Чьи дочки останутся в России
2022 · ARTICLE · ru
В статье представлен процесс выхоа иностранных компаний из России.
Total expenses for managerial remuneration in foreign manufacturing subsidiaries during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot exploration of applied policies
2022 · ARTICLE · en
This study aimed to reveal the policies applied to determine the total expenses for managerial remuneration in manufacturing subsidiaries during the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed the annual financial reports of Russian manufacturing subsidiaries containing data on managerial remuneration and compared the dynamics of annual revenues and the amount of annual managerial remuneration. We identified four types of policies regarding the total amount of managerial remuneration. In a minority of cases, when revenues decreased, the share of the total amount of managerial remuneration in total revenues also decreased. We also observed “payment for efforts”; although revenues decreased in 2020, the share of the total amount of managerial remuneration in total revenues increased. In 17% of cases, when revenue increased, the share of the total amount of managerial remuneration in revenue also increased. Finally, in 50% of cases, the COVID-19 pandemic served as a pretext to generate savings from the reduction in the total amount of managerial remuneration despite the increase in revenues. This is the first study to use real financial reports to evaluate the dynamics of the total amount and share of managerial remuneration in revenue during a crisis.
ANTICIPATED TRAJECTORIES OF DEVELOPMENT IN GLOBAL INDUSTRIES AND THE EVOLUTION OF CORPORATE PARENTING STYLES OF MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS
2022 · PREPRINT · en
World Investment Report 2020 by UNCTAD identified several possible trajectories of development for many industries, namely re-shoring, regionalization, diversification, and replication. We argue that those trajectories of development may result in changes to prevailing corporate parenting styles and may also lead to the emergence of less common parenting styles. We present a typology of corporate parenting styles and outline likely changes to these styles arising from the different developmental trajectories and the major actors of the changes in corporate parenting styles. Although many of the anticipated changes may be pursued by corporate headquarters, a combination of powerful subsidiaries putting bottom-up pressure on corporate headquarters, along with powerful owners, capable of imposing requirements on top management teams and generating top-down pressure, may enact new corporate parenting styles.
THE BEHAVIOUR OF FOREIGN MANUFACTURING CORPORATIONS IN RUSSIA AFTER THE LAUNCH OF ‘A SPECIAL MILITARY OPERATION’ OF RUSSIA IN UKRAINE
2022 · PREPRINT · en
This study examines the behaviour of foreign manufacturing corporations in Russia in the first months after the launch of ‘a special military operation’ of Russia in Ukraine. While service companies and most of the largest industrial corporations operating in Russia announced different types of changes in their operations (e.g., self-restriction of investments, shortening the range of products, intentions to exit from Russian assets, etc.) as well as the temporary cessation of operations due mostly to logistical problems and the deficit of components, the operations of smaller industrial corporations were less affected by the political pressure and economic factors. Notably, less than 17% of the corporations that opened new factories between 2012 and 2019 in Russia announced self-restrictions on operations or intentions to exit from Russian assets. In this study, we reveal the factors that stipulate or impede the intentions to exit from Russian assets and indicate several factors that are missing in the extant literature on foreign subsidiary divestment.
Rituals of Opening Ceremonies of Overseas Manufacturing Facilities of Multinational Corporations in Russia
2021 · ARTICLE · en
We explore the meaning of rituals of public plant-opening ceremonies, which are popular in many countries and mandatory in Russia for greenfield investment projects implemented by multinational corporations. The study is based on the analysis of videos from the public opening ceremonies supplemented with the analysis of financial data on the studied industrial projects. We argue that in a country with underdeveloped physical infrastructure and volatile business regulations opening ceremonies for new industrial projects have three implications: 1) such events are festivities which are centered on an exchange of gratitude between foreign investors and the local authorities for their non-opportunistic behavior; and 2) such events serve as “the rite of passage” of a newly-built facility into the local business and social infrastructure; 3) assurances in speeches during opening ceremonies about the long-term nature of industrial projects are taken seriously as obligations and serve as an additional barrier to exit from industrial assets.
The past, the present, and the foreseeable future of Russian manufacturing subsidiaries of Western multinational corporations
2021 · ARTICLE · en
This paper retraces the development of Russian manufacturing subsidiaries of Western multinational corporations from the late 1980s until 2019. Using secondary sources and a unique hand-crafted database on significant extensions of manufacturing facilities of Western multinational corporations in Russia during 2012–2018, we present the position of Russian manufacturing subsidiaries of Western multinational corporations before and after the beginning of sanctions. We also indicate the major strategic challenges that they currently face, including the necessity to maintain dual loyalty (to home country and host country authorities), manage the deteriorating quality of business regulations in Russia, and overcome the increasing shortage of qualified personnel at all levels. The data on the opening of new facilities in 2017–2018 reveal that such issues impede but cannot stop the quantitative development of foreign-owned Russian manufacturing facilities. At the same time, saving on managerial expenses and low ‘investments in non-current assets’ of the established manufacturing subsidiaries may break down ‘the innovation engine’ assembled in many Russian manufacturing subsidiaries of Western multinational corporations and bring them into the periphery of their corporate parents, where the attention and resources from the corporate centre are lacking.
Looking in the rear-view mirror—A 35 year retrospective on the Russian automotive industry
2021 · ARTICLE · en
Drawing on foundational arguments from the literature on emerging market institutional strategies, and employing a realist historical analysis, we present a retrospective on the Russian automotive industry. We begin by tracing the origins of the sector and synthesizing salient post World War II developments. We then recount the subsequent expansionary decade of the 1960s, followed by the stagnation of the late 1980s, culminating in the eventual collapse of socialism and the breakup of the USSR. Attracted by both the rapid growth in the local market, and the preferential tax rates that accompanied investments, we then document the swift expansion of production facilities in Russia by major global manufacturers in the 2000s. We show how eventually an ensuing sharp halt in local market growth, and an accompanying rise in spare production capacity, saw most manufacturers pursue institutional strategies aimed at obtaining new tax concessions and leveraging intra-industry cooperation, rather than divesting their recently established production facilities. Overall, our retrospective, in particular, calls attention to how global manufacturers were able not only to acquire and rejuvenate existing production facilities or install new greenfield ones, but also to exercise their agency in shaping the broader policy framework and in fashioning new sectoral institutions designed to buttress and sustain the industry.
LOOKING IN THE REAR-VIEW MIRROR: A THIRTY-FIVE YEAR RETROSPECTIVE ON THE RUSSIAN AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY
2021 · PREPRINT · en
Drawing on foundational arguments from the literature on emerging market institutional strategies, and employing a realist historical analysis, we present a retrospective on the Russian automotive industry. We begin by tracing the origins of the sector and synthesizing salient post World War II developments. We then recount the subsequent expansionary decade of the 1960s, followed by the stagnation of the late 1980s, culminating in the eventual collapse of socialism and the breakup of the USSR. Attracted by both the rapid growth in the local market, and the preferential tax rates that accompanied investments, we then document the swift expansion of production facilities in Russia by major global manufacturers in the 2000s. We show how eventually an ensuing sharp halt in local market growth, and an accompanying rise in spare production capacity, saw most manufacturers pursue institutional strategies aimed at obtaining new tax concessions and leveraging intra-industry cooperation, rather than divesting their recently established production facilities. Overall, our retrospective, in particular, calls attention to how global manufacturers were able not only to acquire and rejuvenate existing production facilities or install new greenfield ones, but also to exercise their agency in shaping the broader policy framework and in fashioning new sectoral institutions designed to buttress and sustain the industry.
Location of Russian Enterprises of Foreign Corporations Opened in 2012–2018
2020 · ARTICLE · en
Using the secondary data sources, we identified all new factories, opened by foreign multinational corporations in Russia in 2012-2018. Almost 80% of the 261 factories opened in the last seven years are located in just 20 Russian administrative regions. Moscow (city and oblast), Kaluga oblast, St.Petersburg and Leningrad oblast, The Republic of Tatarstan, Lipetsk oblast, Nizhny Novgorod oblast and Ulyanovsk oblast are the leaders in accommodating foreign industrial investments. The majority of foreign investors preferred special economic zones and industrial parks as territories for installation of new facilities. Proximity to suppliers, availability of the local market, preferred tax regime, guaranteed infrastructure and articulated care of the local authority about the needs of foreign investors are the main factors that determine the choice of the region for industrial investments of foreign corporations.
Foreign direct investment in a stagnant economy: Recent experience of FDI in manufacturing facilities in Russia
2020 · ARTICLE · en
This study presents a snapshot of investment projects in manufacturing that were implemented by foreign investors in Russia during 2017–2018. We assemble a unique database of all new plants opened by foreign companies in Russia during 2012–2018 to clarify the distribution of investment projects implemented during 2017–2018 across industries and territories with different tax regimes. We also identify the most interesting individual investment projects, interrelated investment projects, and elements of collective actions. In general, foreign investors in manufacturing demonstrate high ingenuity in discovering and exploiting the remaining emerging growing market segments and promising niches in consumer and professional markets and express significant persistence in realizing investment projects. We also demonstrate the methods applied to decrease the uncertainty of the project costs by establishing partnerships with local foreign- and domestically owned companies and the attempts to correct the government’s decisions and regulatory measures that are uncomfortable for foreign investors.
Курсы (0)
Нет курсов.