DSA Faculty
API
← к списку преподавателей

Скрынникова Инна Валериевна

Факультет гуманитарных наук

Профиль на hse.ru ↗ тел.: +7 (495) 531 00 00 | 27834
Публикаций
13
Языков
3
Наград
1
Конференций
3
Профиль Публикации (13) Курсы (2)

Профессиональные интересы

когнитивные наукинейрокогнитивное моделированиекогнитивная лингвистикавоплощенное познаниенейронная теория языка и метафорывоплощенный ИИОбработка естественного языка (NLP)аналогическое рассуждение и модели ризонингапонимание естественного языка и инференс ( NLU, NLI)

Должности

  • Приглашенный преподаватель — Факультет гуманитарных наук, Школа лингвистики
  • Приглашенный преподаватель — Факультет компьютерных наук, Департамент анализа данных и искусственного интеллекта
  • Старший научный сотрудник — Факультет компьютерных наук, Лаборатория анализа семантики

Био

  • · Начала работать в НИУ ВШЭ в 2025 году.
  • · Научно-педагогический стаж: 21 год.

Образование

  • 2011 · Ученое звание: Доцент
  • 2005 · Кандидат филологических наук: тема диссертации: Вербализация концепта "пространственная локализация" в англоязычной лингвокультуре"
  • 2001 · Специалитет: Калмыцкий государственный университет, специальность «Филология», квалификация «Филолог. Преподаватель»
  • — · Специальность "Зарубежная филология"

Опыт работы

  • · 23 года

Награды и поощрения

  • · 2023 г. - Research Fellow, University of Gent, Belgium, Faculty of Arts & Philosophy (Research Project “Conceptual underpinnings, frame scenarios and cross-domain mappings: the case of metaphor translatability in discourse”) 2013-2014 - Erasmus Mundus Action II Aurora Researcher, University of Groningen, Netherlands, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Language and Cognition, Neurolinguistics group

Гранты и проекты

  • — · Сложные языковые и семантические модели в искусственном интеллекте

Конференции (3)

Показать все
  • · 2025: ИИ и общество (Москва). Доклад: Интерпретируемый ИИ в задачах генерации образного языка
  • · 2025: IV Международный конгресс Язык, культура и технологические транзиты: новые грани человеческого (Томск). Доклад: Нейронная теория языка и метафоры как парадигма промптинга для больших языковых моделей
  • · 2025: Междисциплинарные исследования манипулятивных практик в цифровой среде (Москва). Доклад: Образный медиафрейминг как персуазивный механизм создания манипулятивных нарративов

Идентификаторы исследователя

Публикации (13)

Analogical reasoning in uncovering the meaning of digital-technology terms: the case of backdoor

2020 · ARTICLE · en

The paper substantiates the critical role of analogical reasoning and figurative languge in resolving the ambiguity of cybersecurity terms in various expert communities. Dwelling on the divergent interpretations of a backdoor, it uncovers the potential of metaphor to serve both as an interpretative mechanism and as a framing tool in the ongoing digital technologies discourse. By combining methods of corpus research and frame semantics analysis the study examines the challenges of unpacking the meaning of the contested concept of the backdoor. The paper proposes a qualitatively new metaphor-facilitated mode of interpreting cybersecurity vulnerabilities based on MetaNet deep semantic metaphor analysis and outlines the merits of this hierarchically organized metaphor and frames ontology. The utility of the method is demonstrated through analyzing corpus data and top-down extracting of metaphors (linguistic metaphor – conceptual metaphor – entailed metaphor – inferences) with subsequent identifying of metaphor families dominating the cybersecurity discourse. The paper further claims that the predominant metaphors prompt certain decisions and solutions affecting information security policies.

DOI ↗

Constructing Modern Russian Identity Through Discourse Metaphors

2020 · ARTICLE · en

The current paper presents a comprehensive literature review of research into the phenomenon of Russian national identity and emphasizes the crucial role of discourse metaphor in narratives of national culture and identity. The latter, as a complex mental construct, encompasses common or similar beliefs or opinions internalized in the course of socialization as well as emotional attitudes, behavioural and linguistic dispositions. The paper claims that Russian patriotism-based national identity construction is directly related to the historical background, current political ideology, as well as objectives and tasks the state sets. Patriotic sentiments in Russia tend to boost due to some life-changing dramatic events or challenges the country has to face; this gives rise to employing a multitude of discursive practices, which rely heavily on discourse metaphors. The relevant point the paper proposes lies in the fact that discourse metaphors, being conceptually grounded, serve as a pervasive cognitive mechanism applied to explain a complex abstract concept of national identity. However, its meaning is still being shaped in relation to a particular period of time and the context where a debate is unfolding. Unlike conceptual metaphors that are considered to be universal, independent of time, discourse metaphors change or evolve within the ongoing discourse and are intended for specific purposes. The current paper seeks to demonstrate how particular metaphors can serve as discursive mechanisms of constructing the national identity to achieve both culturally and historically specific strategic purposes. The authors claim that a combination of co-occurring metaphors in the public discourse forms a holistic extended metaphorical narrative promoting a particular view of Russianness and focus on some of them.

DOI ↗

Metaphor Co-Creation in Reframing Cybersecurity Issues

2020 · CHAPTER · en

The paper substantiates the explanatory and interpretative potential of analogical reasoning in resolving the ambiguity of defining cybersecurity. By applying cognitive linguistics and corpus linguistics methods, it presents an attempt to showcase how the metaphor co-creation strategy may be helpful in reframing the discourse around cybersecurity dominated by inapt metaphors. The latter, in their turn, prompt wrong inferences, which ultimately results in false decisions about the nature of cyber vulnerabilities. The comparison of the conversational valence introduced by professional audience and laymen involved in the campaign of co-creating new metaphor-based utterances reveals how it channels the cybersecurity discourse, and is followed by outlining the implications of applying the newly created metaphors.

DOI ↗ PDF ↗

Курсы (2)